The main problem with web fingerprinting is privacy invasion, as it allows websites, online services, and third parties to profile, track, and identify users across multiple browsing sessions and websites without their consent.

Moreover, there are enough data points that can be freely collected to help websites create unique visitor IDs with high confidence. For example, websites employ fingerprinting libraries to collect data from JavaScript APIs offered by browsers, including browser version, number of CPUs, screen size, codecs, and more.īecause this data does not need cookies to collect, existing protection systems are weak against fingerprinting. Web fingerprinting is a sophisticated tracking method that can identify users across multiple sessions and websites without using cookies or other persistent storage.įingerprinting works by analyzing a user’s web browser and hardware configuration to generate a unique ID. This applies even in cases where the user has wiped their browser’s cache and restarts them or when they use a VPN connection.Ī software developer using the moniker “ Bitestring” tested an open-source tool released by a company that offers “fingerprinting as a service” to websites against Chrome, Firefox, and Tor, and the results are worrying. Current web fingerprinting solutions can still bypass most privacy protections offered in modern web browsers, persistently tracking users and identifying them.

Threema vs signal